ecovote.org > get involved > action alerts > international trade
CAFTA: Corporate America Free Trade Agreement?
Stop the undermining of years of environmental protections
In May, the Bush Administration’s trade representatives signed the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). Like the meetings of the Cheney energy task force, the slashing of Superfund funding and the rollback of Clinton’s Roadless Rule, this happened without much publicity. The Administration did not want people to know what it was doing, and here’s why:
CAFTA is NAFTA with a “C.” Under CAFTA, we could expect the same undermining of democracy by corporations, and the same threats to the environment. Under NAFTA, companies have sued the U.S. government over environmental and health protections. In a notorious ongoing case, the Canadian company Methanex is suing the U.S. for $970 million because California enacted a law that banned the gasoline additive MTBE—which has severely polluted drinking water in many California communities.
CAFTA Facilitates Corporate Bullying and Threatens Environmental Standards:
- CAFTA would allow foreign investors to challenge hard-won environmental laws and natural resource agreements, such as oil, gas, and mineral leases.
- CAFTA fails to include adequate measures to ensure environmental improvement throughout Central America and the U.S. For developing countries, the simple threat of costly investor lawsuits could freeze adoption of environmental standards.
- CAFTA permits foreign investors to demand large monetary compensation for the implementation of legitimate environmental protections.
- CAFTA will give foreign corporations greater rights than local citizens and the opportunity to completely bypass domestic courts, therefore undermining democratic self-government.
- CAFTA does not ensure that food safety and other sanitary standards would be adequate to protect public health and safety and the environment.
CAFTA would undermine California and U.S. law in favor of corporate profits. The agreement provides corporations with powerful tools to pressure governments to overturn or waive environmental and other public interest laws. The threat is all the more serious since U.S. companies would be able to open a subsidiary in another country, such as Guatemala, with weaker environmental protections in order to sue the U.S. and California over laws they don’t like. We must protect California’s right to pass and uphold trendsetting environmental protections.
What You Can Do
In order for CAFTA to become official, it must be approved by Congress. Please call or write Senator Dianne Feinstein and your Congressional Representative, urging them to oppose CAFTA. Also, write a letter to the editor (see our sample letter and contact info) to help build public awareness.
The Honorable Dianne Feinstein
US Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-3841
The Honorable [Your Representative]
US House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
Find your representative at http://www.house.gov.
The following Representatives have been specifically identified as targets for this Alert. Call, fax, or email their offices (or mail to the above address):
- Rep. Susan Davis (53rd District, San Diego)
Phone: 202-225-2040
Fax: 202-225-2948 - Rep. Anna Eshoo (14th District, Palo Alto)
Phone: 202-225-8104
Fax: 202-225-8890 - Rep. Jane Harman (36th District, El Segundo)
Phone: 202-225-8220
Fax: 202-226-7290 - Rep. Zoe Lofgren (16th District, San Jose)
Phone: 202-225-3072
Fax: 202-225-3336 - Rep. Adam Schiff (29th District, Pasadena)
Phone: 202-225-4176
Fax: 202-225-5828 - Rep. Ellen Tauscher (10th District, Walnut Creek)
Phone: 202-225-1880
Fax: 202-225-5914 - Rep. Mike Thompson (1st District, Napa)
Phone: 202-225-3311
Fax: 202-225-4335 - Rep. Jim Costa (20th District, Fresno)
Phone: 202-225-3341
Fax: 202-225-9308

